<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Subject centric</title>
    <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com</link>
    <description>What if every subject that we think about can have explicit representation in our computers?</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Google acquired Metaweb (company that maintains Freebase): good news for Subject-centric computing</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <description>"Google and Metaweb plan to maintain Freebase as a free and open database for the world. Better yet, we plan to contribute to and further develop Freebase and would be delighted if other web companies use and contribute to the data..." (Google blog)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Google_acquired_Metaweb_company_that_maintains_Freebase_good_news_for_Subject-centric_computing</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Google_acquired_Metaweb_company_that_maintains_Freebase_good_news_for_Subject-centric_computing</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TIBCO and Subject-centric computing</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <description>I attended TIBCO's TUCON 2010 conference this year. It gave me a great opportunity to explore  Event-driven Architecture, SOA, BPM and Cloud  computing. I had a chance also to listen/think/talk about the future of computing. And this future looks very subject-centric</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 20:24:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/TIBCO_and_Subject-centric_computing</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/TIBCO_and_Subject-centric_computing</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Carl Hewitt's Direct Logic, inconsistency tolerant reasoning and Subject-centric computing</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Carl_Hewitt">Carl Hewitt</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Paraconsistent_logic">Paraconsistent logic</category>
      <description>I have been fascinated by the idea of building computer systems which are inconsistency tolerant for many years. I usually address this problem from practical perspective: I just try to write code that demonstrates behavior that I would like to model. But I always thought that it should be beneficial to have some kind of a formal logic that can provide foundations for my heuristic approach. I follow Carl Hewitt's work for many years and it seems that his inconsistency tolerant Direct Logic can play this foundational role. Firstly, let's take a look at how traditional logic handles contradictions</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Carl_Hewitt_s_Direct_Logic__inconsistency_tolerant_reasoning_and_Subject-centric_computing</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Carl_Hewitt_s_Direct_Logic__inconsistency_tolerant_reasoning_and_Subject-centric_computing</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iPad, Multi-touch interaction and Subject-centric computing</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Multi-touch_interaction">Multi-touch interaction</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/iPhone">iPhone</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/iPod_touch">iPod touch</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/iPad">iPad</category>
      <description>I am very excited about iPad. It makes multi-touch interaction mainstream. iPad revives and introduces new generation of developers and users to the idea of "direct object manipulation" which is one of the key concepts of Subject-centric computing.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:29:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/iPad_Multi-touch_interaction_and_Subject-centric_computing</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/iPad_Multi-touch_interaction_and_Subject-centric_computing</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inference in Ontopedia</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/OWL">OWL</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Cyc">Cyc</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Paraconsistent_logic">Paraconsistent logic</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Common_logic">Common Logic</category>
      <description>I just finished reading "Semantic Web for the  Working Ontologist: Modeling in RDF, RDFS and OWL". Great book! Lots of examples and deep exploration of Semantic Web fundamentals. It inspired me... not to use OWL, no... but to describe how we approach inference/reasoning in Ontopedia.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:10:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Inference_in_Ontopedia</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Inference_in_Ontopedia</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subject-centric applications: toward subject-centric computing</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <description>Recently we added a small framework that allows us to build/use subject-centric applications in Ontopedia. Within traditional paradigm of application-centric computing, we have to start an application (or go to some domain/function specific website) and then we can change application/website context. Within subject-centric environment, we can select a subject and then we can have access to various applications/functions that can be used with the subject in context</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 14:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_applications_toward_subject-centric_computing</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_applications_toward_subject-centric_computing</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Creating Linked Data" by Jeni Tennison</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/RDF">RDF</category>
      <description>Jeni Tennison published several excellent blog entries which describe process of creating Linked Data. If you are interested in semantic technologies, you will find lots of important ideas in these postings
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Creating_Linked_Data_by_Jeni_Tennison</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Creating_Linked_Data_by_Jeni_Tennison</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Modeling Time and Identity</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/presentations-Are-We-There-Yet-Rich-Hickey">Are We There Yet?</category>
      <description>I really like ideas described in this presentation by Rich Hickey. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:35:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Modeling_Time_and_Identity</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Modeling_Time_and_Identity</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paraconsistent Reasoning in Ontopedia </title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/TMCL">TMCL</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Cyc">Cyc</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Carl_Hewitt">Carl Hewitt</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Paraconsistent_logic">Paraconsistent logic</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Actor_model">Actor model</category>
      <description>I did a short presentation about paraconsistent reasoning in Ontopedia  on TMRA 2009. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Paraconsistent_Reasoning_in_Ontopedia </link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Paraconsistent_Reasoning_in_Ontopedia </guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Association patterns</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/TMCL">TMCL</category>
      <description>I created several PSIs for describing associations based on the idea of patterns (vs. constraints).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/association_patterns</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/association_patterns</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iPhone OS 3.0 - ready for Subject-centric computing</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/iPhone">iPhone</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_micro-blogging">Subject-centric micro-blogging</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/iPhone_Push_Notification_Service">iPhone Push Notification Service</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/IPhone_OS">iPhone OS</category>
      <description>"Apple":http://psi.ontopedia.net/Apple_Inc just introduced "iPhone OS":http://psi.ontopedia.net/IPhone_OS 3.0 (beta) and 3.0 SDK. There are lots of improvements and new features. "iPhone":http://psi.ontopedia.net/iPhone is a great platform for developing mobile applications. OS 3.0 makes it even more compelling for building Subject-centric solutions. One of my favorite  features is Push Notification Service</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/iPhone_OS_3_0_-_ready_for_Subject-centric_computing</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/iPhone_OS_3_0_-_ready_for_Subject-centric_computing</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finding 'facts' (without scanning millions of documents)</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/PSI">PSI</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Generic_User_Interface">Generic User Interface </category>
      <description>The new version of Ontopedia PSI server is out. There are several interesting features in this release. We introduced auto-reification of all assertions, "everything is a subject" now. In the new version, preferable and recommended way to model web resources is to model them as first class "subjects". Another interesting feature is ability to search for 'facts' related to various subjects.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Finding_facts_without_scanning_millions_of_documents</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Finding_facts_without_scanning_millions_of_documents</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subject-centric micro-blogging and Ontopedia's knowledge map</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_micro-blogging">Subject-centric micro-blogging</category>
      <description>Traditionally, when we think about subject-centric approach to organizing information, we have in mind equivalent of "master data" - main entities, their properties and relationships. This type of information is relatively static. Of course, subject-centric approach works well also for representing/organizing  information about "transactions" and "events".</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_micro-blogging_and_Ontopedias_ knowledge_map</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_micro-blogging_and_Ontopedias_ knowledge_map</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Carl Hewitt - Actor model, OWL, knowledge inconsistency and paraconsistent logic</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/OWL">OWL</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Carl_Hewitt">Carl Hewitt</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Paraconsistent_logic">Paraconsistent logic</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Actor_model">Actor model</category>
      <description>ITConversations published recently Jon Udell's interview with Carl Hewitt. In this interview - "Interdependent Message-Passing ORGs", Carl Hewitt shares his ideas about distributed computations, Actor model, inconsistent knowledge, paraconsistent logic and semantic web. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Carl_Hewitt-Actor_model_OWL_knowledge_inconsistency_and_paraconsistent_logic</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Carl_Hewitt-Actor_model_OWL_knowledge_inconsistency_and_paraconsistent_logic</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Watching an interview about Powerset</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/XTM">XTM</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/RDF">RDF</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/PSI">PSI</category>
      <description>InfoQ published an interview with Tom Preston-Werner on Powerset, GitHub, Ruby and Erlang. I really like projects that try to analyze text/resources on the web and try to implement "smart search". Powerset is one of these projects. But what I like even more is the approach when we explicitly represent facts/information items using open knowledge representation standards such as Topic Maps or RDF. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Watching_an_interview_about_Powerset</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Watching_an_interview_about_Powerset</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Extending Ontopedia PSI server to handle PURLs: support for RDF, step one</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/RDF">RDF</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/PSI">PSI</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/SemTech2008">2008 SemTech Conference</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/PURL">PURL</category>
      <description>I have been thinking about RDF support on Ontopedia PSI server for quite some time. Semantic Technology Conference that I attended this spring gave me some new ideas in this direction. I decided to follow recommendations from Eric Miller's and David Wood's  presentation "Persistent Identifiers for the 'Real Web'" regarding PURLs (Persistent Uniform Resource Locators). Ontopedia PSI server was extended to handle PURLs</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Extending_Ontopedia_PSI_server_to_handle_PURLs_support_for_RDF_step_one</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Extending_Ontopedia_PSI_server_to_handle_PURLs_support_for_RDF_step_one</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The new version of Ontopedia PSI server</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Resource-Oriented_Architecture">Resource-Oriented Architecture</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/PSI">PSI</category>
      <description>The new version of Ontopedia PSI server is out now. It is possible to represent various types of assertions related to subjects (names, occurrences, associations). The new PSI server allows also to record and integrate opinions of different users. Its internal knowledge representation is optimized for paraconsistent reasoning</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/The_new_version_of_Ontopedia_PSI_server</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/The_new_version_of_Ontopedia_PSI_server</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2008 Semantic Technology Conference: random observations</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Resource-Oriented_Architecture">Resource-Oriented Architecture</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Oracle_Corporation">Oracle (Corporation)</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/RDF">RDF</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/OWL">OWL</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Yahoo">Yahoo!</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Franz_Inc">Franz Inc</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Ontos_AG">Ontos AG</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Douglas_Lenat">Douglas Lenat</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Cyc">Cyc</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/PSI">PSI</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/SemTech2008">2008 SemTech Conference</category>
      <description>I am back from "Semantic Technology Conference":http://www.semantic-conference.com. It is becoming bigger and bigger each year. This year there were more than hundred sessions, full day of tutorials, product exhibition. It was quite crowded and energizing.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/2008_Semantic_Technology_Conference_random_observations</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/2008_Semantic_Technology_Conference_random_observations</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Serendipitous reuse and representations with basic ontological commitments</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Resource-Oriented_Architecture">Resource-Oriented Architecture</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/CTM">CTM</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <description>Steve Vinoski published a very interesting article: "Serendipitous reuse":http://steve.vinoski.net/pdf/IEEE-Serendipitous_Reuse.pdf. He also provided additional comments in "his blog":http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/01/05/serendipitous-reuse. The author explores benefits of RESTful uniform interfaces based on HTTP "verbs" GET, PUT, POST and DELETE for building expansible distributed systems. He also compares RESTful approach with traditional SOA implementations based on strongly typed operation-centric interfaces.

Serendipitous reuse is one of the main goals of Subject-centric computing. In addition to uniform interfaces, Subject-centric computing promotes usage of uniform representations with basic ontological commitments (as one of the possible representations).  </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Serendipitous_reuse_and_representations_with_basic_ontological_commitments</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Serendipitous_reuse_and_representations_with_basic_ontological_commitments</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Slides from  Topic Maps 2008</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <description>I did a presentation and tutorial at  "Topic Maps 2008":http://www.topicmaps.com/tmc/conference.jsp?conf=TM2008. 
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Slides_from_Topic_ Maps_2008</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Slides_from_Topic_ Maps_2008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Authoring topic maps using Ruby-based DSL: CTM, the way I like it</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/CTM">CTM</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Ruby_(programming_language)">Ruby (programming language)</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Domain-specific_programming_language">Domain Specific Language</category>
      <description>Designing and using Domain Specific Languages (DSL) is a popular programming style in Ruby community.
I am experimenting with Ruby-based DSL for authoring topic maps. Surprisingly, the result is very close to
my view on the "ideal" CTM (Compact Topic Maps syntax). </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Authoring_topic_maps_using_Ruby_based_DSL_CTM_the_way_I_like_it</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Authoring_topic_maps_using_Ruby_based_DSL_CTM_the_way_I_like_it</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subject-centric blog in XTM (Topic Maps interchange) format</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/XTM">XTM</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Topic_Maps">Topic Maps</category>
      <description>XTM export has been available on Subject-centric blog from the first day. But, I think, it was not obvious what readers can do with it. I added a link to "Subject-centric topic map":http://www.ontopedia.net/omnigator/models/topic_nontopoly.jsp?tm=subject-centric.xtm&amp;id=id_d13864244f388d31a24c79ad3f1603dd in "Omnigator":http://www.ontopia.net/omnigator (Topic Maps browser).</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:16:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_blog_in_XTM_Topic_Maps_interchange_format</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_blog_in_XTM_Topic_Maps_interchange_format</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subject-centric computing and robotics: Osaka will soon be known as the capital of the robotics world..?</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Robotics">Robotics</category>
      <description>I was in Kyoto for three days in December. Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto is a region with high concentration of companies involved in robotics. I cannot stop thinking about robotics and Subject-centric computing after this trip. Traditionally, when we talk about Subject-centric computing (SCC) and Topic Maps (as enabling technology), we assume more or less slowly evolving models. In the world of robotics, models are evolving in real time. 
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_computing_and_robotics_Osaka_will_soon_be_known_as_the_capital_of_the_robotics_world</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_computing_and_robotics_Osaka_will_soon_be_known_as_the_capital_of_the_robotics_world</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Resource-Oriented Architecture and Subject-centric computing vs. traditional SOA: modeling business transactions</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Resource-Oriented_Architecture">Resource-Oriented Architecture</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/RESTful_Web_Services">RESTful Web Services</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Service-oriented_architecture">Service-oriented architecture (SOA)</category>
      <description>If we look at traditional SOA, business transactions are modeled typically as service operations that are part of a service contract. Operation invocations in traditional SOA are not treated as first class "objects". Operation invocations do not have own identity. Components/processes inside of a service and service clients cannot reference individual operation calls. Situation is different if we look at subject-centric and RESTFul services. </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Resource-Oriented_Architecture_and_Subject-centric_computing_vs_traditional_SOA_modeling_business_transactions</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Resource-Oriented_Architecture_and_Subject-centric_computing_vs_traditional_SOA_modeling_business_transactions</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multi-touch interaction, iPhone and Subject-centric computing</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Multi-touch_interaction">Multi-touch interaction</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/iPhone">iPhone</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/iPod_touch">iPod touch</category>
      <description>If you follow news related to HCI (human-computer interaction), then you probably saw multi-touch interaction demonstrations by Jeff Han. You probably already use (or played) with iPhone or iPod touch. So you know what multi-touch interaction is about. This kind of interface goes hand in hand with Subject-centric computing. Why?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Multi-touch_interaction_iPhone_and_Subject-centric_computing</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Multi-touch_interaction_iPhone_and_Subject-centric_computing</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OS X Leopard and subject-centric computing</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Ruby_(programming_language)">Ruby (programming language)</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/OS_X_Leopard">OS X Leopard</category>
      <description>I upgraded one of my Mac-based systems with OS X Leopard. It is great. I like it. But from the 
subject-centric perspective it is still more or less a traditional application/document-centric OS.
How can we make it more subject-centric? </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/OS_X_Leopard_and_subject-centric_computing</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/OS_X_Leopard_and_subject-centric_computing</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subject-centric programming language or what was good about COBOL</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/TMCL">TMCL</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/TMQL">TMQL</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/CTM">CTM</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Ruby_(programming_language)">Ruby (programming language)</category>
      <description>I did a short presentation (3 slides) about requirements for a new subject-centric programming language on TMRA 2007. I made a reference to COBOL as a language that had built-in high-level support for defining and manipulating "business data". Many modern programming languages "outsourced" data handling to relational databases and lost transparency and simplicity in manipulation of data.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_programming_language_or_what_was_good_about_COBOL</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Subject-centric_programming_language_or_what_was_good_about_COBOL</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Resource-oriented architecture and Subject-centric computing: what is the difference?</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/ISO_13250">ISO 13250</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/XTM">XTM</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Resource-Oriented_Architecture">Resource-Oriented Architecture</category>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/RESTful_Web_Services">RESTful Web Services</category>
      <description>I just finished reading RESTful Web Services. It is an amazing book and I think it will play a very important role in defining main principles of the next generation of the Web. The authors of the book introduce the Resource-Oriented Architecture (ROA) as an architecture for building the resource-centric programmable Web. "Resource" is a fundamental concept in this architecture.
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Resource-oriented_architecture_and_Subject-centric_computing_what_is_the_difference</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/Resource-oriented_architecture_and_Subject-centric_computing_what_is_the_difference</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>About "Subject-centric"</title>
      <category source="http://www.subjectcentric.com/psi/Subject-centric_computing">Subject-centric computing</category>
      <description>Representation of "real life" objects and direct object manipulation were fundamental ideas during early days of personal computers. Unfortunately, over the years these ideas have been forgotten in the mainstream of computing. Not entirely, of course. We have GUI, object oriented programming.
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/About_Subject-centric</link>
      <guid>http://www.subjectcentric.com/post/About_Subject-centric</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
